Holding Death Gently: An IFS Approach to Dying and Grief
- Noah Carroll
- May 9
- 4 min read
Updated: May 15
Death is not just a moment—it’s a profound process, one that touches every part of the human psyche. Whether facing the death of a loved one, confronting our own mortality, or grieving what has been lost, we meet parts of ourselves that may otherwise remain hidden. Internal Family Systems (IFS), developed by Dr. Richard Schwartz, offers a compassionate and healing way to navigate death and dying by understanding that our inner world is composed of multiple “parts,” each with its own emotions, beliefs, and roles.
Meeting the Parts That Face Death
When death enters our life, whether anticipated or sudden, many internal parts may become activated. One part may feel numb and disconnected. Another might feel panicked, overwhelmed by existential dread. There may be a practical manager trying to make arrangements, a spiritual part seeking meaning, or a young exile carrying unresolved grief from past losses.

In IFS, we don’t try to silence these parts or override them. Instead, we turn toward them with curiosity and compassion.
We learn to ask:
Who in me is deeply afraid right now?
Who in me is trying to hold everything together?
Who in me is carrying old grief or unfinished pain?
Each part has a reason for being. Even the ones that feel extreme or contradictory are trying to help in some way.
Grief as a Systemic Response
Grief doesn’t follow a single path—it is a system-wide response. In the IFS framework, grief can be seen as the process by which all parts adjust to the absence of a person or identity that anchored the system. When someone dies, we may not only mourn their physical absence but also the parts of ourselves that relied on them for safety, identity, or love.
Parts may become unmoored:
A protector part may become hypervigilant, stepping in to guard against further loss.
An exile part may erupt with childhood grief that was never witnessed.
A manager part may seek to suppress emotion to “keep it together” for others.
Instead of trying to get rid of or manage these responses, IFS invites us to gently be with them, from the seat of the Self—that inner source of calm, connected presence.
The Role of Self in the Face of Mortality
Self-energy—the core, centered presence within each of us—is not afraid of death; it holds space for fear. It is not overwhelmed by grief; it bears witness to it.
When we relate to our parts from Self, even in the most painful moments, something begins to shift. The fear doesn’t necessarily go away, but it no longer drives. The grief doesn’t disappear, but it becomes something we can move with, instead of against.
IFS offers us a way to die—and to grieve—with more wholeness, with fewer regrets, and with deeper meaning.
IFS at the End of Life
For those approaching death, IFS can help create peace within. Many people carry exiles full of shame, regret, or unreleased burden. There may be protector parts resisting letting go. Others may fear being forgotten or leaving loved ones behind.
By allowing these parts to be heard and understood, we make room for reconciliation—within the self and with others. We may find that parts begin to soften, and a deep sense of Self can emerge: present, calm, open-hearted, and able to face the unknown with grace.
Holding Space for the Dying and the Living
Whether you're a caregiver, loved one, or simply a fellow human, using an IFS lens in conversations around death opens up more space for empathy, honesty, and healing. Instead of rushing to soothe or explain away the pain, we can ask:
What parts are most active right now?
What do they need to feel heard?
Can I meet them from my own Self?
In doing so, we honor the full spectrum of the human experience—and bring compassion into one of life’s most meaningful thresholds.
Euphemisms and Avoidance
The way we talk about death and dying matters. Terms like “passed away,” “no longer with us,” or “lost” are common, often used to soften the impact. While well-intentioned, euphemisms can create distance from the reality of death. For some, this avoids pain; for others, it prevents honest grieving.
Direct, simple language—“he died,” “she is dying”—can feel stark but often opens the door to authenticity. Naming death directly honors its reality and can help loved ones process it more clearly.
Language of Control vs. Surrender
Phrases like “lost the battle” or “fighting cancer” frame death as defeat. While this may resonate with some, it can also imply failure. An alternative is to use language that reflects presence and agency without judgment—such as “living with illness,” “approaching the end of life,” or “dying on their own terms.”
Holding Space with Words
When someone is dying—or grieving—language becomes less about fixing and more about witnessing. Phrases that create safety can be helpful:
“I’m here with you.”
“You don’t have to go through this alone.”
“It’s okay to talk about whatever you’re feeling.”
Silence, when paired with a calm, grounded presence, can be just as powerful.
In Closing
In the human space of death and dying, both our inner parts and our spoken words shape the experience. Internal Family Systems reminds us that each reaction to death—fear, denial, hope, grief—comes from a part trying to protect us. When we meet those parts with compassion and speak with honesty and care, we create a path toward deeper connection. Language becomes more than communication—it becomes a vessel for presence, healing, and meaning. In facing death, we are invited not only to speak more truthfully, but to listen more gently—within and with each other.
At the end of life, words can become a balm or a barrier. Clear, compassionate language invites openness. It helps people say what needs to be said, feel what needs to be felt, and connect more deeply, with our inner-selves and one another, in the time that remains.
Comments